Legal Opinion

Kline v. Guaranty Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1914No. L.A. No. 3245PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. P. Wood, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment in Eavor of plaintiff for $2,769.65 and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The business relations between the parties grew out of certain transactions culminating in a lease to plaintiff by defendant of certain supposedly oil-bearing property and the damages demanded were for an alleged violation of said contract. The agreement dated February 4, 1911, recited that for and in consideration of a nominal sum paid and the further consideration of mutual covenants and agreements contained in the instrument, the Guaranty Oil Company, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Payne v. NeuvalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Brookshire Oil Co. v. Casmalia Ranch Oil & Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Nester v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
  3. Overstreet v. MerrittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Priddy v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Westervelt v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API