Legal Opinion

Rhine v. Morris

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1884No. 11,172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellant, as administrator of the estate of James Swoveland, sued appellee and others on a promissory note and a written agreement for the sale of an interest' in a saw-mill. ‘ On motion of appellee a part of the second paragraph of the complaint was struck out. The ruling upon the motion to strike out is the only question presented by the assignment of errors.

The first paragraph of the complaint was upon the note, and the second was upon the agreement. The agreement stipulated that the -defendants would pay to the deceased for his interest in the saw-mill the sum of $300 in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Alcorn v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Boyce v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Seymour v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Thomas v. GriffinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Peck v. Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
  4. McDonald v. GeisendorffIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State Ex Rel. Steinbach v. SizeloveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API