Legal Opinion
Roni v. Rahim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*852The plaintiffs seek to recover damages as a result of injuries allegedly sustained by the infant plaintiff due to lead-paint ingestion which occurred during a period when he resided in an apartment located in a multiple-dwelling property in Brooklyn (hereinafter the building), which was constructed in 1933. At some point prior to the plaintiffs’ tenancy, the building allegedly was “purchased” by the defendant Baitul Center; however, the deed to the property was issued in the name of the defendant United Bank of Kuwait, PLC (hereinafter the Bank), which funded the purchase of the building.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Inc. v. ValloneNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- O'Neal v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Jolicoeur v. Great Oaks Associates, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- G.M.M. v. KimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Osario v. BalramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Roni v. RahimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008