Legal Opinion
Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-On-Hudson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
Plaintiff, a corporation, a landowner in the county of Westchester, brings this action to set aside a tax assessment imposed upon its land by the defendants, the trustees of the village of Croton-onHudson, the basis of its complaint being that the land subjected to the assessment is not a part of the village.
Section 348 of the Village Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 64) prescribes the mode in which territory not within a village may be annexed thereto. The petition for annexation to be presented to the trustees shall be signed by a majority of the persons qualified to vote for town…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Methodist Episcopal Union Church v. . PickettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Litchfield v. . VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Village of Lynbrook v. CadooNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Von Lengerke v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Mason v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gwynne v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Bramley v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Wright v. RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Bramley v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- People ex rel. Village of Spring Valley v. SchroederNew York Supreme Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.