Legal Opinion
ANR Pipeline Co. v. Conoco, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 22, 1986No. G86-819PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff ANR Pipeline Corporation (“ANR”) and Defendant Conoco, Inc. (“CONOCO”) are both Delaware corporations authorized to do business in Michigan. ANR is engaged in the business of purchasing, transporting and selling natural gas to various gas distribution utilities in nine different states including Michigan. ANR maintains its headquarters and other offices in Michigan. Defendant CONOCO is a producer and marketer of natural gas and is one of ANR’s major suppliers of natural gas.
On or about August 27, 1985, ANR filed its Verified Complaint in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Amoco Production Company v. Sea Robin Pipeline Company, Pennzoil Producing Company v. Sea Robin Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988
- Michigan Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.