Harvest v. Castro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether and, if so, under what circumstances, a district court has the authority to modify a conditional writ of habeas corpus after the time provided in the order has lapsed. We hold that the district court does have such authority, but that such modifications may only be made pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure. In this ease, the State has failed to demonstrate that relief under Rule 60 is warranted; therefore, we reverse the district court, concluding that it abused its discretion when it modified the conditional writ. We remand with…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ramos v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Judulang v. ChertoffDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
- C.A.R.V. v. Minga Wofford, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.