Legal Opinion
Arebalo v. Apple, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 25, 2022No. 5:19-cv-03034Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JOSHUA AREBALO, Case No. 5:19-cv-03034-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE 10 v. SETTLEMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 11 APPLE, INC., ENFORCE SETTLEMENT Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 85 13 14 Before the Court are the parties’ competing motions concerning their settlement 15 agreement. Pro se Plaintiff Joshua Arebalo seeks to set aside the settlement under Federal Rule of 16 Civil Procedure 60(b). Not. of Mot. and Mot. to Set Aside Settlement and Vacate Order to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Shannon Casey v. Albertson's Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- McDonough v. City of QuincyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Morey v. VannucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.