Legal Opinion

Hager v. Romines

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 28, 1995No. 2-95-066-CVPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Thomas and Betty Romines grew tomatoes and jalapefios on one-half acre of land in Clay County, Texas. When their plants began dying from exposure to herbicide, they sued Hager Flying Service and Anthony Ray Hag-er, who had applied herbicide from a crop dusting airplane to a nearby field the same day the Romineses noticed that their tomato plants were sick. At trial, the court denied Hager’s motion for instructed verdict. The jury awarded Thomas and Betty Romines $45,000 as damages. Hager appeals in five points of error. We sustain point of error one, reverse the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cosgrove v. GrimesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rowland v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. FFE Transportation Services, Inc. v. FulghamTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Turbines, Inc. v. Dardis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  3. Foust v. Estate of Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  4. J.D. Abrams, Inc. v. McIverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy IICourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API