Legal Opinion

State v. Soderberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The complaint in this case contains ten counts, each charging gross neglect of defendant’s duties as lawyer. It probably would unduly extend this opinion, without performing a corresponding service, to discuss the counts in detail. It is enough to say that, individually and collectively, they show, with respect to the matters involved, flagrant neglect of business on the part of defendant. In several cases defendant, after being intrusted with important business, literally did nothing about it, even failing to answer letters of inquiry. Complaints were made to the judicial committee of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. State v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. BoniszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. HaggertyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State v. SoderbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API