Legal Opinion

Colman v. Department of Mental Health

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1998No. Docket No. 106897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Department of Mental Health may seek reimbursement for the cost of care it provided to Barbara *432Hertsberg from a trust established for her benefit. The determinative question is who should be considered the settlor of the trust — Barbara Hertsberg, or her mother, Edith Hertsberg, who funded the trust pursuant to a court order. The probate court concluded that Barbara was the settlor, and that the department could seek reimbursement from the trust. The Court of Appeals held that Edith was the settlor, and that the trust could not be reached. We reverse, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Ronney v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re Johannes TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In Re Maloney TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Hertsberg Inter Vivos TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API