Legal Opinion

State v. Zunker

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 6, 2002No. 19729-8-IIIPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

—A

jury found Leiton L. Zunker guilty of one count of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and one count of manufacturing methamphetamine. Mr. Zunker challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of intent to deliver on the grounds that the quantity of methamphetamine he possessed — two grams — was not enough to deliver. And while that may be true, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient here to support an intent to deliver when we consider other evidence, including ingredients to make methamphetamine, scales, and notebooks with names and numbers.

Mr. Zunker also challenges the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Binh ThachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. BrammeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API