Legal Opinion

Parvin v. Jays Electric Service

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1957No. 37072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

Ella Parvin, hereinafter called claimant, filed her claim on April 20, 1955, stating that she sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her employment with Jays Electric Service on April 6, 1954. The employer and the insurance carrier, Utilities Insurance Company, hereinafter called respondents, filed their answer denying that claimant sustained an accidental personal injury while in the employ of respondents, or arising therefrom, and plead the statute of limitations.

After hearing the testimony the trial judge found:

“1. That the evidence does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corzine v. Traders CompressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. v. DavisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. DeVore v. Maidt Plastering Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. New York Indemnity Ins. Co. v. FerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Morgan v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hackley v. Dalles Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Brandt v. Western Oklahoma Butane CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Cranfill v. JG Beard EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Beck v. J. B. Cuppy Freight LinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Bland v. Eagle-Picher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API