Legal Opinion

DeVore v. Maidt Plastering Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1951No. 33629PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This case is here on petition by William O. DeVore to review an order of the State Industrial Commission denying him compensation on a claim filed by him against his employer, Maidt Plastering Company and its insurance carrier, Central Surety & Insurance Company.

Petitioner in his claim filed on the 4th day of February, 1948, stated that, on December 23, 1947, while in the act of pouring cement he stepped in a hole causing a strain to his back resulting in some permanent disability to his body as a whole.

Petitioner at the hearing upon the claim testified: At the time he sustained his claimed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Corzine v. Traders CompressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. McCarthy v. Forbes Painting & Decorating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Adams v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wright v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Brookshire v. Knippers Plumbing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Cummins v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Butts v. ROSE DRILLING COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API