Legal Opinion

Mattox v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7426SC40PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARSON, Judge.

It is well founded that a sovereign State may be sued by a private individual only when the State has given permission to do so. Ferrell v. Highway Commission, 252 N.C. 830, 115 S.E. 2d 34 (1960); Smith v. Hefner, 235 N.C. 1, 68 S.E. 2d 783 (1952); Shipyard, Inc. v. Highway Comm., 6 N.C. App. 649, 171 S.E. 2d 222 (1969). The plaintiffs acquired the right to sue the State in their first action pursuant to G.S. 41-10.1. They allege that this statute allows them to sue the State here for the fair rental value of the property. G.S. 41-10.1 provides:

Trying title to land where State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Floyd v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Ferrell v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Lincoln Construction Co. v. Property Control & Construction Division of the Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. In re Thompson Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API