Legal Opinion
Willard C. Beach Air Brush Co. v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 22, 1953No. Civ. 1093PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
The present hearing in the above cause was strictly limited, in accordance with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 1 to the issue as to whether or not there has been a valid “accord and satisfaction” between the parties to the litigation on the complaint filed herein. “That the plaintiff has in fact entered into a valid and binding agreement for the settlement and discontinuance of this suit” and has in fact settled it, is clear from the evidence: We turn to the facts.
Willard C. Beach claimed to be the inventor of a valuable…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peyser v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Wild v. PaysonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- State v. LoponioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Trenton Street Railway Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio v. May Spach, as Receiver for Ro-Ben, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Peters v. WallachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- United States v. Ben Grunstein & Sons CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.