Legal Opinion

Ardrey v. Federal Kemper Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1992No. Civ.A.No. 90-7912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

This action arises as a result of the Pennsylvania General Assembly’s enactment of *107automobile insurance reform legislation in February of 1990. See 75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1791-1799.7 (“Act 6”). Act 6 required insurers, inter alia, to reduce private passenger motor vehicle insurance by between ten (10) and twenty (20) percent. In reaction to this change in Pennsylvania’s regulatory environment, defendant Federal Kemper Insurance Company (“Kemper”) changed its system of insurance agent compensation in Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs, James W. Ardrey d/b/a Ardrey…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
  2. Fanning v. AcroMed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  3. Szczubelek v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  4. Dale v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API