Legal Opinion

Lundstrom v. Young

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 5, 2019No. 3:18-cv-02856Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BRIAN LUNDSTROM, Case No. 3:18-CV-2856-GPC-MSB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 CARLA YOUNG, an individual; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING 16 INCORPORATED, LIGAND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO 17 PHARMACEUTICALS SEAL; DENYING DEFENDANT INCORPORATED 401(k) PLAN; and YOUNG’S MOTION FOR 18 DOES 1 through 20, SANCTIONS 19 Defendants. [ECF Nos.: 46, 47, 48, 50, 56, 58] 20 21 22 Before the Court are Defendant Carla Young’s (“Young”) motion to dismiss the 23 first amended complaint…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API