In re R. Hal Compton Crude Oil Purchasing Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
The facts are stipulated. However, it does not appear from the stipulation that there was any contract between the parties other than a general understanding that debtor would deliver oil to claimant and that the latter would transport the same in its pipe line to the refinery and there deliver it to debtor. Indeed, the stipulation is that “pursuant” to Interstate Commerce Commission Tariff No. 161, debtor delivered to claimant at various dates in November and December of 1940 and January, 1941, separate quantities of oil, some thirty-three in number, varying from 821…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffreySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Morgan v. . CongdonNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Wabash Railroad v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Knapp, Stout & Co. Co. v. McCaffreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Potts v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Braufman v. Hart Publication, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951