Kent v. Hibernia Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. The grantee in a deed to secure debt, containing a power of sale, is not required to give notice to the grantor of his intention to exercise the power of sale contained in the instrument, where the same provides for no notice other than by advertising in a given manner. King v. Walker, 141 Ga. 63, 64 (80 S. E. 312); Garrett v. Crawford, 128 Ga. 519, 523 (57 S. E. 792, 119 Am. St. R. 398, 11 Ann. Cas. 167); Ellis v. Ellis, 161 Ga. 360 (1-a), 362 (130 S. E. 681). Accordingly, the contention of the defendant debtor that he was not given such additional notice is without merit.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garrett v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Loganville Banking Co. v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Howell v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bank of Lumpkin County v. JustusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Giordano v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Morrison v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- West Lumber Company v. SchnuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Williams v. First Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.