Von Schack v. Von Schack
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] Mary Mulhearn Von Schack appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (West Bath, Field, J.). She raises a single question: When considering a complaint for divorce in which only the plaintiff is a Maine resident, does the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1, require a Maine court to have personal jurisdiction over the defendant in order to render a divorce judgment that dissolves the parties’ marriage without determining the collateral issues of property division, parental rights, or support? We conclude that personal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Emma B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Denise K. Lynch v. Daniel G. LynchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.