Legal Opinion

Von Schack v. Von Schack

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 30, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] Mary Mulhearn Von Schack appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (West Bath, Field, J.). She raises a single question: When considering a complaint for divorce in which only the plaintiff is a Maine resident, does the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1, require a Maine court to have personal jurisdiction over the defendant in order to render a divorce judgment that dissolves the parties’ marriage without determining the collateral issues of property division, parental rights, or support? We conclude that personal…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Emma B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Denise K. Lynch v. Daniel G. LynchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  5. Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API