Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Donald E. Holmes, Debtor, in Proceedings for a Wage Earner Plan Under Chapter Xiii

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1962No. 6985_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court affirming an order of the Referee in Bankruptcy, dismissing a Chapter XIII proceedings, in which the appellant-debtor sought confirmation of a wage earner plan (i. e. §§ 623 and 646) for an extension of time to pay his debts in full. The order of dismissal is based on the notion that the debtor, having availed himself of a like plan within six years next preceding the filing of this plan, is barred by Section 14, sub. c(5) of Chapter III, which, as applied by the District Court to a Chapter XIII proceedings, would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Jensen. Peoples Finance Co. v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. In Re ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
  3. In Re VerlinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
  4. In Re MahaleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
  5. Fishman v. VerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Craig L. Edins and Mary P. Edins Debtors v. Helzberg's Diamond Shops, Inc., and William Porter, Receiver in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. In the Matter of Danilo A. Mayorga, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. In re HardyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
  4. Appeal of ShammaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. In re NicholsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API