Legal Opinion

Appeal of Shamma

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1977No. 7542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee cueiam.

The principal issue presented by this case is whether a wage earner eligible to proceed under chapter XIII of the Federal Bankruptcy Act may also qualify to proceed in insolvency under state law provisions. We hold that he may not.

The petition of Joseph F. and Theresa C. Shamma to proceed in insolvency under the provisions of RSA ch. 568 was denied by the Probate Court (Treat, J.) on the ground that the plaintiffs are entitled to proceed under chapter XIII of the Federal Bankruptcy Act. 11 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1970). Pursuant to RSA ch. 567-A (Supp. 1975), the plaintiffs appealed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perry v. Commerce Loan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bass Public Ltd. Co. v. Promus Companies Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  5. In Re BradfordDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Edgar Stella, Debtors v. Government Development Bank of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API