Legal Opinion

State Cinema of Pittsfield, Inc. v. Matthew J. Ryan, Jr., Esq., William J. Flynn, Esq., and Milo Brown

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 27, 1970No. 7449PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a motion picture exhibitor, was ordered to eease showing the film “Vixen” by a state assistant district attorney and a state police officer on pain of seizure of the print and arrest of its agents, 1 2 presumably for violation of the Massachusetts obscenity statute. 3 This action was brought to enjoin the district attorney and state police officer from threatening arrest and prosecution or from seizing or suppressing the film for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the order. By agreement of the parties, the district court heard the request for a temporary restraining order as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cameron v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bantam Books, Inc. v. MelkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. New American Library of World Literature, Inc. v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. MelkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammerhead Enterprises, Inc. v. BrezenoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API