Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fitzgerald

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1983No. 81-914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

This appeal presents to the court what appears to be a case of first impression. The question presented is, When does the seller of an automobile cease to be its owner within the meaning of a standard automobile insurance policy which provides coverage to both the named insured and those operating the vehicle with the named insured’s permission? The trial court, concluding that the question was one of fact, submitted the issue to the jury, which found for the appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). For reasons more particularly set out in this opinion, we believe…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Turpin v. Standard Reliance Insurance Co.(Mutual)Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Garbark v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Loyal's Auto Exchange, Inc. v. MunchNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dugdale of Nebraska, Inc. v. First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Craig v. Hastings State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Royal Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Worley v. SchaeferNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API