Legal Opinion

Lord v. Lord

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1939No. 2386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order overruling the demurrers filed by various of the respondents and is prosecuted in the names of all of the respondents who demurred, except the respondent William Borthwick, tax commissioner of the Territory, whose demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed as to him. None of the respondents who did not demur, except George Marion Lord and Rosemary Marion Lord, who filed answers in which they admitted the allegations of the bill and joined in the prayer of the bill, were served with a copy of the notice of appeal.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co. v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lufkin v. Grand Hotel Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kealoha v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Robinson v. KaaeHawaii Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pioneer Mill Co. v. WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re Appeal of GoodfaderHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Appeal of GoodfaderHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API