Legal Opinion
Daniel v. ABM Industries Incorporated
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 31, 2022No. 4:21-cv-00269Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION STACEY DANIEL PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:21-cv-00269-KGB ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is defendant ABM Industries Incorporated’s (“ABM”) motion to dismiss and compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 9). Plaintiff Stacey Daniel alleges that ABM retaliated against her and discriminated against her based on her gender, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, Ark. Code. Ann. § 16-23-101 et seq. (“ACRA”)…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.