Legal Opinion

Parsch v. Massey

Charlottesville County Circuit Court

Decided October 4, 2006No. Case No. 04-193PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Edward L. Hogshire

In this civil case regarding the validity of a corporate loan known as the “Triad Bridge Loan,” only six Defendants remain. These are Triad, L.C. (“Triad”), Tovaris I.P., L.C. (“Tovaris I.P.), GlobalCerts, L.C. (“GlobalCerts”), Tovaris L.C. (“Tovaris”), Samuel G. Patterson, and Richard W. Gordon, pursuant to the Plaintiffs’ nonsuit and refiled complaint.

At a July 6,2006, hearing on various motions, final determinations on the Defendants’ Demurrer, Defendants Gordon and Patterson’s Plea of the Statute of Limitations, and Defendants Triad, Tovaris, and GlobalCerts’ *122Spe…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
  5. Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberta Casden v. Michael BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. DCG & T ex rel. Battaglia/Ira v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  3. Parsch v. MasseyCharlottesville County Circuit Court · 2009
  4. David Kirdassi v. Mitchell Scott White, DCCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API