Legal Opinion

Holley v. Florala Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1931No. 4 Div. 554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The appellant sued the appellees for breach of contract, the complaint in its several counts averring that: “On to-wit, the 15th day of October, 1929, the defendants, who did on said date own and operate a telephone exchange and all business properly pertaining thereto, in Florala, Alabama, entered into the following contract with plaintiff, which said contract was oral: That defendants would install a telephone in plaintiff’s home, a distance of, to-wit, 8 miles from Elorala and connect said telephone with defendants’ exchange and/or central office at Elorala, Alabama; that in the connection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Life Insurance v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank v. BuckheitAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Roach v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Terrell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HughstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nussenbaum v. Chambers & Chambers Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Jack Cole, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API