Hartman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
As a result of Ernst & Young LLP’s sale of its consulting services business in 2000, William F. Hartman received stock in Cap Gemini, S.A. He and his wife, Therese Hartman, reported the receipt of that stock as income on their 2000 federal income tax return and paid the resulting tax. They now seek a partial refund of the tax they paid, alleging that Mr. Hartman did not receive all of the stock in 2000. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are presently before the court. For the reasons set forth below, the court concludes that the Hartmans are not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Estate of Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kettle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021