Shepard v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
The issue presented is whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar plaintiffs’ causes of action asserting (1) usury law violations under Chapter 24 of the North Carolina General Statutes and (2) unfair and deceptive trade practices, derived from the usury claims, under section 75-1.1. We hold that the statutes of limitations began to run on these claims at the closing of the loan when the fee in dispute was paid, and therefore plaintiff’s claims are barred.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Wayne Shepard and Rosemary Sanders Shepard obtained a second mortgage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Russell v. AyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Swindell v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Housecalls Home Health Care, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State Employees Ass'n of North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of State TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.