Switzer v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant is a fish hauler who purchases live fish from commercial fish farms and sells some of them to pay lakes. The pay lake operators release the fish in their lakes and charge their patrons a set fee for the privilege of fishing. A limit is generally imposed upon the number of fish a fisherman may catch and take home for the set fee.
R. C. 5739.02 levies a tax upon each retail sale made in this state. R. C. 5739.02(B)(2), however, specifically excepts from the application of the tax “sales of food for human consumption off the premises where sold. ’ ’
Appellant claims that his sales of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Blocker Drilling Canada, Ltd. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Sekerak v. Fairhill Mental Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- NLO, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Ormet Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- NDM Acquisition Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.