Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 1, 2008No. A08-94PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Gemma E. Graham committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, that she engaged in the unauthorized practice of law for a period of more than 20 years while on restricted status for failing to submit the affidavits of continuing legal education (CLE) compliance required by Rule 9 of the Rules of the Minnesota State Board of Continuing Legal Education, in violation of Rules 5.5 and 8.4(d), Minn. R. Prof. Conduct.
Respondent admits…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Snyder v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jay A. Rosenberg, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0397875. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025