Legal Opinion

United States v. Rafael Aldana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2017No. 16-50372, 16-50385PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Rafael Aldana and Julio Cesar Suarez were each convicted of the misdemeanor offense of “attempting] to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(1). While not disputing that they entered the United States miles away from any established port of entry facility, Aldana and Suarez argue that because the applicable regulations designate entire geographic regions as ports of-entry, there was insufficient evidence that they had violated the statute. We conclude that a place…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Juvenile MaleSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United States v. Natividad Duran, United States of America v. Martin Roman, United States of America v. Rodolfo Almaraz MoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Lkav, Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Robert RoachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Sarah CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Oracio Corrales-VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Manuel Melgar-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. April in Paris v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API