Gardner v. Buechler
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action by a real-estate broker to recover a commission for his services in securing a purcháser for the defendant’s premises, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Booth, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $1,207, and appeal by the defendant.
1Per curiam
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a real-estate broker to procure a purchaser of his premises in Bridgeport for the sum. of $55,000, and that the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff a commission of two per cent of said selling price. The finding sets up a like employment, "if he secured a purchaser on terms satisfactory to the defendant.” The defendant claims that the contract of the complaint was a special óne, and that found by the court is a different one. The terms found include the terms set up in the complaint. There is no variance.
Further, the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Stagg v. LawtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Wright v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930