Legal Opinion

Mangham v. Hotel & Restaurant Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1963No. 40062PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

1. Mutual mistake may be a good defense in law to the enforcement of a contract. Code § 20-308. But a defendant seeking in a court of law to avoid his contract for this reason must allege the grounds of the mistake as fully as he would be required to do in a court of equity. Lowery v. Davidson, 44 Ga. 38 (3); Hargrove v. Bledsoe, 78 Ga. App. 107 (50 SE 223). This means that the pleading must show the particular mistake and illustrate how it occurred, why the terms of the contract which the pleader insists should have been inserted were left out, or how terms not agreed upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Franklin Savings & Loan Co. v. BrananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Robertson v. PanlosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Helton v. ShellnutSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Frank & Co. v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walsh v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Leventhal v. SeiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Romine, Inc. v. Savannah Steel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Sepulvado v. Daniels Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Capitol Materials, Inc. v. Kellogg & Kimsey, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API