Legal Opinion
Unidyne Corp. v. Aerolineas Argentinas
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 7, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-504-NPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
This matter arises on the motion of the Argentine Naval Commission to dismiss the above-styled action asserting that this Court lacks both subject matter and in personam jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. § 1602, et seq. (1977). For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
The plaintiff, Unidyne Corporation, alleges in the complaint at hand that a C-4 Ionosounde Pulse Radar Unit, a sophisticated instrument used to test levels of the ionosphere, owned by the Argentine Navy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Verlinden B. v. V. Central Bank of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Yessenin-Volpin v. Novosti Press AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Verlinden B v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Lenwood Williams, Jr. v. The Shipping Corporation of IndiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea BolivianaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Marlowe v. Argentine Naval CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Hyatt Corp. v. StantonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Co. v. Viskoza-LoznicaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998
- Obenchain Corp. v. Corp. Nacionale De InversionesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.