United States v. Rayas
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Brosman, Judge:
This case raises questions having to do with the right of an accused person to monitor the performance by the court-martial’s interpreter of his duties. Because of the narrow character of the issues involved, a detailed statement of the facts on which the court’s findings were based is unnecessary.
The accused confessed to, and — following trial in Japan by general court-martial — was convicted of, violations of a lawful general regulation,1 through using a syrette to administer a narcotic drug, and attempting to sell two morphine syrettes, military…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. MendesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Rajnowski v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. RussellNevada Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. DonatiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- State v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. LadellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.