Legal Opinion
In re Associated Homeowners & Businessmen's Organization, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel R. Rosenberg, J.
Application to quash a subpoena issued by the Attorney-General pursuant to section 352 of the General Business Law (art 23-A [Martin Act]) requiring petitioner to appear and give testimony relating to the former’s investigation of alleged fraudulent practices in the sale of securities in a certain co-operative apartment plan is denied.
The subpoena here challenged was issued in conjunction with a pending investigation by the Attorney-General into alleged fraudulent practices employed by a firm known as Associated Homeowners and Businessmen’s Organization, Inc. (Associated), and its officers in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Doheny v. . LacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Charles H. Greenthal & Co. v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HarrisonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
- People v. FarmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diamond v. StrattonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- People v. SlochowskyNew York Supreme Court · 1982