Kisten v. Kisten

The defendant contends that under the circumstances the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to extend the time in which to settle and serve the bill of exceptions. Sec. 270.47, Stats., in part, provides:

“After judgment is perfected either party may serve upon the other a written notice of the entry thereof; and service of a proposed bill of exceptions, by either party, must be made within ninety days after service of such notice.”

A party may, in the discretion oí the court or judge, be relieved from a failure to act timely under sec. 270.47, Stats., if good cause…