Jackson v. Whartenby
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, Nevada County. The facts fully appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
The complaint in this cause alleges that the defendants were indebted to plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and fifty-one dollars, upon several accounts, in favor of Bagley & Hildreth, certified to by the Secretary of the company, and transferred, for value received by Bagley & Hildreth, to plaintiff; and also upon an order for one hundred dollars, *95drawn by George Hutt in favor of Charles S. Bagley upon William B-Holmes, another Secretary of the “ Slate Creek Company,” for money as wages due Hutt, which order was accepted by Holmes, as Secretary of the company,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lehnhardt v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sellery v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.