Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Williams

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 9, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

On petition for certiorari under our Rule No. 34 applicable to interlocutory orders, we review order of the chancellor wherein motions to strike counter-claim and to dismiss counter-claim were denied.

The suit was by bill in equity to foreclose certain alleged tax liens and improvement liens on certain described lands. The suit is in rem as no personal liability attaches. The City of Jacksonville, a municipal corporation, was plaintiff and the defendants named were Pearl M. Williams and Ernest Williams, her husband, George W. Hendricks and his wife Nina G. Hndricks, Jennie Lou…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Turner v. UtleySupreme Court of Florida · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pan American Surety Company v. Jefferson Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. City of Boca Raton v. SharpDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. P. W. Wilkins and Co. v. StoerSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  4. P. W. Wilkins and Co. v. StoerSupreme Court of Florida · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API