Legal Opinion
Rowlett v. Great South Bay Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 1997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered May 28, 1996, to the extent it granted, on reargument, summary judgment to plaintiffs on their claim under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously reversed, and the motion for summary judgment is denied, without costs. Upon search of the record, summary judgment is granted to defendants, dismissing the complaint and the third-party action (CPLR 3212 [b]). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
*184Plaintiff George Rowlett, an air conditioning mechanic, went to the Montauk Shopping Center, in late October 1990, to perform…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Howe v. 1660 Grand Island Boulevard, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Perez v. New York City Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jehle v. Adams Hotel AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gleason v. GottliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Caraciolo v. 800 Second Avenue CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rhodes-Evans v. 111 Chelsea LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Anderson v. Olympia & York Tower B Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.