Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1960No. 4-57-Civ-15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1952) as amended, and asks us to determine that defendant is primarily liable to an insured who is dually covered by automobile liability policies of both the plaintiff and of the defendant. The defendant answers that it is not liable because of a household exclusion clause in its policy, and has made a third party complaint against the insured for a declaratory judgment to the same effect.

The facts have been agreed upon. Reverend Vernon Stagner was required to do extensive traveling as the Secretary-Director…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. SmootDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1950
  3. Pratt v. Hanover Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. UngerNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newark Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API