COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY v. Universal Paragon Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Appellant Universal Paragon Corporation, formerly known as Tuntex (USA), Inc. (UPC), hired respondent law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy (CP&M) to represent it in complex environmental litigation. After a settlement in the underlying action was reached, UPC and CP&M were unable to agree on the amount of fees owed to CP&M under their written fee agreement. The parties proceeded to binding arbitration, as provided for in the agreement, and the arbitrator awarded CP&M $7,554,149.13 in attorney fees and expenses. UPC appeals the superior court judgment confirming the award…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Ahdout v. HekmatjahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Panoche Energy Center, LLC v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.