Legal Opinion

In re City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1905No. 5909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to dismiss appeals from an order of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered May 31, 1905, confirming an assessment roll; also, motion for separate attorney’s fees.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

One hundred and three parties, owning separate and distinct parcels of land, gave notice of appeal to this court from an order confirming an assessment roll in the court below. Some of the appellants gave, or attempted to give, bonds to render their appeals effectual, others did hot. Before any further steps were taken, or expenses incurred, in the prosecution of the appeals, the appellants filed in the court below and served on the respondent, a notice that they and each of them abandoned their respective appeals. After the filing and service of such notice of abandonment, the respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Allen & Powell v. CatlinWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Agassiz v. KelleherWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Getchell v. Great Northern Ry. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. White v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Rock v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API