Legal Opinion · Dissent

Levorsen v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2016No. 14-4162Published

1DissentHolmes, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. The sole question on appeal is whether a plasma-donation center constitutes a “service establishment” within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12181(7)(F). In contrast to the majority, I do not believe that such centers fall within the ambit of the term “service establishment.” Therefore, I would affirm the district court’s judgment.

I

A '

In 42 U.S.C. § 12181(7)(F), Congress identified a category of “private entities [that] are considered public accommodations” — i.e., service establishments — under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API