Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Per curiam
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by defendants-cross appellants, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by plaintiffs-appellants. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response and briefs of amici curiae were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:(1) The petition of defendants-cross appellants…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.