Legal Opinion

Rice v. Landry's, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided September 5, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00940Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION KATHLEEN RICE and ) ROGER RICE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 3:22-cv-00940 ) LANDRY’s LLC and ) NASHVILLE AQUARIUM, INC., ) ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This is a slip-and-fall case. Landry’s LLC and Nashville Aquarium, Inc. have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 22). Kathleen and Roger Rice have not responded in opposition, despite asking for and receiving an extension of time to do so. (See Doc. Nos. 25, 26). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion will be granted. I. UNDISPUTED FACTS1…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Blair v. West Town MallTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. West v. East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Diane DOWNS Ex Rel. Ryan Cody DOWNS v. Mark BUSH Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API