Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Epperson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1910No. 7472PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Prince, J., Sumter, 1909. Action by Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company against Mary A. Epperson. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: Defendant has no right to do business here: 84 S. C., 318. Unclosure by fence: 60 S. C., 389; 63 S. C., 267; 67 S. C„ 548; 72 S. C„ 228; 82 S. C., 24. cites: Title by adverse possession against railroad: 63 S. C., 266; 67 S. C., 499, 548; 72 S. C., 288; 82 S. C., 24; 20 At., 940; 37 S. C., 327; 45 S. C., 274; 54 L.…

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Sumter, 1909. Action by Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company against Mary A. Epperson. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: Defendant has no right to do business here: 84 S. C., 318. Unclosure by fence: 60 S. C., 389; 63 S. C., 267; 67 S. C„ 548; 72 S. C„ 228; 82 S. C., 24. cites: Title by adverse possession against railroad: 63 S. C., 266; 67 S. C., 499, 548; 72 S. C., 288; 82 S. C., 24; 20 At., 940; 37 S. C., 327; 45 S. C., 274; 54 L. R. A., 522; 190 U. S., 266; 2 L. R. A., N. S., 272. cite: Right to do business here: 174 U. S., 562; 64 S. C., 162.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant from interfering with its alleged right of way, and to require her to' remove certain buildings and fences thereon. The defendant denied the allegations of the complaint, and set up the defense of adverse possession for the statutory period. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and a permanent injunction was granted, whereupon the defendant appealed upon exceptions, the first of which is as follows :

1 “Because his Honor erred in overruling the defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. v. BeaudrotSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  2. Blackwell v. British American Mtg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  3. Hill v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Dawkins v. MathisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  5. Tate, Muller & Wittichen v. PeguesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Bean v. Piedmont Interstate Fair Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  4. Smith v. Southern Railway—Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. DawesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API