Smith v. Southern Railway—Carolina Division
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
The question for determination on this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding by the jury that respondents acquired title by adverse possession to a portion of appellant s right of way. The Southern Railway passes through a farm in Orangeburg County owned by respondents, father and son. In this area it is straight and runs north and south. It is conceded for the purpose of this case that appellant originally had fee simple title to a right of way through respondents’ farm extending 100 feet from the center of the track on each side. Respondents say…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Ry. v. BeaudrotSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Cathcart v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Mullis v. WinchesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. v. Limestone Globe Land Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Hill v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- PALMETTO CONSERVATION FOUNDATION v. SmithDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
- Walker v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987